<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="todaycom/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Amazing Grace&#8221; and the Concept of &#8220;Christian&#8221; Film</title>
	<link>http://religionandfilm.today.com/2008/12/26/amazing-grace-and-the-concept-of-christian-film/</link>
	<description>A look at religion and worldviews in films</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://religionandfilm.today.com/2008/12/26/amazing-grace-and-the-concept-of-christian-film/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://religionandfilm.today.com/2008/12/26/amazing-grace-and-the-concept-of-christian-film/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Great question Drew.  I am assuming a satire of Chistian film, rather than Christianity itself.  No, I would not think it possible without gaining the heretic label.  It would probably have to take on a documenatry feel...but then again...it wouldn't be a satire then, would it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question Drew.  I am assuming a satire of Chistian film, rather than Christianity itself.  No, I would not think it possible without gaining the heretic label.  It would probably have to take on a documenatry feel&#8230;but then again&#8230;it wouldn&#8217;t be a satire then, would it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://religionandfilm.today.com/2008/12/26/amazing-grace-and-the-concept-of-christian-film/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://religionandfilm.today.com/2008/12/26/amazing-grace-and-the-concept-of-christian-film/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Great question Drew.  I am assuming you mean a satire of Christian film rather than Christianity itself.  I do not think you can make a truly satirical film of christian film without being labelled a heretic.  It ouwld probably have to take for form of a documentary, but then it wouldn't be a satire....would it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question Drew.  I am assuming you mean a satire of Christian film rather than Christianity itself.  I do not think you can make a truly satirical film of christian film without being labelled a heretic.  It ouwld probably have to take for form of a documentary, but then it wouldn&#8217;t be a satire&#8230;.would it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zackyg</title>
		<link>http://religionandfilm.today.com/2008/12/26/amazing-grace-and-the-concept-of-christian-film/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>zackyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://religionandfilm.today.com/2008/12/26/amazing-grace-and-the-concept-of-christian-film/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>its soo possible.
its so hard... but lets strive for it yea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its soo possible.<br />
its so hard&#8230; but lets strive for it yea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


